训练用单针/双针带线【出售】-->外科训练模块总目录
0.5、1、2、3.5、5mm仿生血管仿生体 - 胸腹一体式腹腔镜模拟训练器
仿气腹/半球形腹腔镜模拟训练器
[单端多孔折叠]腹腔镜模拟训练器
「训练教具器械汇总」管理员微信/QQ12087382[问题反馈]
开启左侧

[病历讨论] 骨膜分支和隔皮穿支对游离腓骨皮瓣结果的影响

[复制链接]
发表于 2022-12-15 00:00:06 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册

×
使用游离腓骨皮瓣 (FFF) 进行颌骨重建的虚拟手术计划 (VSP) 已成为常规程序,需要计算机断层扫描血管造影 (CTA) 对下肢血管系统和骨骼进行术前评估。 该研究的目的是评估腓骨动脉的骨膜分支 (PB) 和皮肤隔穿支 (SCP) 的分布和密度是否对皮瓣成功有影响。

这项回顾性临床研究评估了 72 名接受 FFF 手术的患者的膝下血管系统和小血管系统的术前 CTA。 皮瓣转移的手术结果包括伤口愈合、小计和总皮瓣丢失与节段性血管供应相匹配。

共有 72 名患者(28 名女性,38.9%;44 名男性,61.1%)符合研究纳入标准。 平均年龄为 58.5 岁(± 15.3 岁)。 下肢血管狭窄 (n = 14) 主要在腓动脉 (n = 11) 中检测到。 皮瓣成功记录在 n = 59 (82.0%) 中,皮瓣部分失败在 n = 4 (5.5%) 中,皮瓣完全丢失在 n = 9 (12.5%) 中。 该研究发现供体现场 FA 的平均数 (± SD) 为 2.53 ± 1.60 PB 和 1.39 ± 1.03 SCP。 多节段颌骨重建的近端 FFF 段显示每个皮瓣段的 PB 率高于远端段。 基于准备节段的总数 (n = 121)、46.7% (n = 7) 的单段、40.4% (n = 21) 的双段和 31.5% (n = 17) 的三段腓骨皮瓣 至少由成功组中的一个 PB 提供。 总体而言,这相当于所有成功的 FFF 的 37.2%(121 个中的 45 个)。 对于总皮瓣损失 (n = 14),记录了不同供应段的相对数量 42.9% (n = 6)。 供体部位的伤口愈合障碍在统计学上不受 SCP 检出率的显著影响。

一般来说,较高的 PB 和 SCP 发生率与皮瓣成功率之间的相关性无法通过研究样本进行统计证明。 得出结论,基于常规 CTA 成像的术前 PB 和 SCP 映射不适合预测皮瓣结果。

骨膜分支和隔皮穿支对游离腓骨皮瓣结果的影响

骨膜分支和隔皮穿支对游离腓骨皮瓣结果的影响

本研究的工作流程。 总共 n = 72 计算机断层扫描血管造影 (CTA) DICOM 数据集的虚拟计划下颌重建与游离腓骨皮瓣被纳入调查。 腘动脉下血管分支模式、狭窄、骨膜分支和腓动脉隔皮穿支的分布和密度的发现与皮瓣手术结果相匹配。

骨膜分支和隔皮穿支对游离腓骨皮瓣结果的影响

骨膜分支和隔皮穿支对游离腓骨皮瓣结果的影响

56 岁男性,口腔鳞状细胞癌 (T4) 在 38 区浸润性生长(图 5 中的 ID 18)。 (A) OPT 中骨质破坏的扩展和 (B) 电影体积渲染 CT 重建。

骨膜分支和隔皮穿支对游离腓骨皮瓣结果的影响

骨膜分支和隔皮穿支对游离腓骨皮瓣结果的影响

(A) 最终成型的双节段复合腓骨瓣和 (B) 新下颌骨。 追加三角游离植骨,平滑新下颌骨轮廓。 最后,在这种情况下发生了完全的皮瓣丢失。 手术修复显示合并有动脉和静脉血栓形成。

骨膜分支和隔皮穿支对游离腓骨皮瓣结果的影响

骨膜分支和隔皮穿支对游离腓骨皮瓣结果的影响

(A) 供体部位的 CTA 扫描(轴向平面)。 黄线将发现的 PB 和 SCP 与虚拟手术计划联系起来。 (B) 游离腓骨瓣双节段下颌骨重建的最终虚拟手术计划。 (C) 黄线将相应的容器与操作区域连接起来。 (D) 应用切割指南,进行截骨术,并塑造新髁。 案例是图 5 中的 ID 18。在 CTA 评估中,记录了 5 PB 和一个 FA 在捐助地点的 SCP。 每个腓骨皮瓣段由一个 PB 提供,而三个位于设计皮瓣的近端。 基于 CTA 的 SCP 位置位于近端腓骨皮瓣段皮肤桨叶的中间。 FA 的放射学检查没有病理学发现(I-B 型:膝下分支模式,这意味着 ATA、PTA 和 FA 中的腘动脉三分叉)。 总体而言,对手术没有放射学保留或限制。 图 3A、C 显示放射学和手术结果之间存在差异。 SCP 的数量至少为 4(绿色箭头)。
 楼主| 发表于 2022-12-15 00:00:07 | 显示全部楼层
1. Taylor GI, Miller GD, Ham FJ. The Free Vascularized Bone Graft. A Clinical Extension of Microvascular Techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg (1975) 55(5):533–44. doi:  10.1097/00006534-197505000-00002   
2. Hidalgo DA. Fibula Free Flap: A New Method of Mandible Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg (1989) 84(1):71–9. doi:  10.1097/00006534-198907000-00014   
3. Cordeiro PG, Disa JJ, Hidalgo DA, Hu QY. Reconstruction of the Mandible With Osseous Free Flaps: A 10-Year Experience With 150 Consecutive Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg (1999) 104(5):1314–20. doi:  10.1097/00006534-199910000-00011   
4. Wei FC, Chen HC, Chuang CC, Noordhoff MS. Fibular Osteoseptocutaneous Flap: Anatomic Study and Clinical Application. Plast Reconstr Surg (1986) 78(2):191–200. doi:  10.1097/00006534-198608000-00008   
5. Kumar BP, Venkatesh V, Kumar KA, Yadav BY, Mohan SR. Mandibular Reconstruction: Overview. J Maxillofac Oral Surg (2016) 15(4):425–41. doi:  10.1007/s12663-015-0766-5   
6. Löfstrand J, Nyberg M, Karlsson T, Thórarinsson A, Kjeller G, Lidén M, et al.. Quality of Life After Free Fibula Flap Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defects. J Reconstr Microsurg (2018) 34(2):108–20.  
7. Tarsitano A, Ciocca L, Cipriani R, Scotti R, Marchetti C. Mandibular Reconstruction Using Fibula Free Flap Harvested Using a Customised Cutting Guide: How We do it. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital (2015) 35(3):198–201.   
8. Attia S, Wiltfang J, Streckbein P, Wilbrand JF, El Khassawna T, Mausbach K, et al.. Functional and Aesthetic Treatment Outcomes After Immediate Jaw Reconstruction Using a Fibula Flap and Dental Implants. J Craniomaxillofac Surg (2019) 47(5):786–91. doi:  10.1016/j.jcms.2018.12.017   
9. Attia S, Diefenbach J, Schmermund D, Bottger S, Pons-Kuhnemann J, Scheibelhut C, et al.. Donor-Site Morbidity After Fibula Transplantation in Head and Neck Tumor Patients: A Split-Leg Retrospective Study With Focus on Leg Stability and Quality of Life. Cancers (Basel) (2020) 12(8). doi:  10.3390/cancers12082217   
10. Attia S, Wiltfang J, Pons-Kühnemann J, Wilbrand JF, Streckbein P, Kähling C, et al.. Survival of Dental Implants Placed in Vascularised Fibula Free Flaps After Jaw Reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg (2018) 46(8):1205–10. doi:  10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.008   
11. Petrovic I, Baser R, Blackwell T, McCarthy C, Ganly I, Patel S, et al.. Long-Term Functional and Esthetic Outcomes After Fibula Free Flap Reconstruction of the Mandible. Head Neck (2019) 41(7):2123–32. doi:  10.1002/hed.25666   
12. Wilde F, Winter K, Kletsch K, Lorenz K, Schramm A. Mandible Reconstruction Using Patient-Specific Pre-Bent Reconstruction Plates: Comparison of Standard and Transfer Key Methods. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg (2015) 10(2):129–40. doi:  10.1007/s11548-014-1065-1   
13. Wilde F, Schramm A. [Computer-Aided Reconstruction of the Facial Skeleton : Planning and Implementation in Clinical Routine]. HNO (2016) 64(9):641–9. doi:  10.1007/s00106-016-0220-0   
14. Wilde F, Hanken H, Probst F, Schramm A, Heiland M, Cornelius CP. Multicenter Study on the Use of Patient-Specific CAD/CAM Reconstruction Plates for Mandibular Reconstruction. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg (2015) 10(12):2035–51. doi:  10.1007/s11548-015-1193-2   
15. Ersoy H, Rybicki FJ. MR Angiography of the Lower Extremities. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2008) 190(6):1675–84. doi:  10.2214/AJR.07.2223   
16. Lorbeer R, Grotz A, Dörr M, Völzke H, Lieb W, Kühn JP, et al.. Reference Values of Vessel Diameters, Stenosis Prevalence, and Arterial Variations of the Lower Limb Arteries in a Male Population Sample Using Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography. PLoS One (2018) 13(6):e0197559. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0197559   
17. Schuderer JG, Meier JK, Klingelhöffer C, Gottsauner M, Reichert TE, Wendl CM, et al.. Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Free Fibula Harvest: Anatomy and Perforator Mapping. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2020) 49(2):176–82. doi:  10.1016/j.ijom.2019.09.005   
18. Rozen WM, Phillips TJ, Ashton MW, Stella DL, Gibson RN, Taylor GI. Preoperative Imaging for DIEA Perforator Flaps: A Comparative Study of Computed Tomographic Angiography and Doppler Ultrasound. Plast Reconstr Surg (2008) 121(1 Suppl):1–8. doi:  10.1097/01.prs.0000293874.71269.c9   
19. Abdel Razek AA, Denewer AT, Hegazy MA, Hafez MT. Role of Computed Tomography Angiography in the Diagnosis of Vascular Stenosis in Head and Neck Microvascular Free Flap Reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2014) 43(7):811–5. doi:  10.1016/j.ijom.2014.03.014   
20. Garvey PB, Chang EI, Selber JC, Skoracki RJ, Madewell JE, Liu J, et al.. A Prospective Study of Preoperative Computed Tomographic Angiographic Mapping of Free Fibula Osteocutaneous Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg (2012) 130(4):541e–9e. doi:  10.1097/PRS.0b013e318262f115   
21. Ribuffo D, Atzeni M, Saba L, Guerra M, Mallarini G, Proto EB, et al.. Clinical Study of Peroneal Artery Perforators With Computed Tomographic Angiography: Implications for Fibular Flap Harvest. Surg Radiol Anat (2010) 32(4):329–34. doi:  10.1007/s00276-009-0559-y   
22. Eckardt A, Swennen GR. Virtual Planning of Composite Mandibular Reconstruction With Free Fibula Bone Graft. J Craniofac Surg (2005) 16(6):1137–40. doi:  10.1097/01.scs.0000186306.32042.96   
23. Seruya M, Fisher M, Rodriguez ED. Computer-Assisted Versus Conventional Free Fibula Flap Technique for Craniofacial Reconstruction: An Outcomes Comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg (2013) 132(5):1219–28. doi:  10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a3c0b1   
24. Han HH, Kim HY, Lee JY. The Pros and Cons of Computer-Aided Surgery for Segmental Mandibular Reconstruction After Oncological Surgery. Arch Craniofac Surg (2017) 18(3):149–54. doi:  10.7181/acfs.2017.18.3.149   
25. Saini V, Gaba S, Sharma S, Kalra P, Sharma RK. Assessing the Role of Virtual Surgical Planning in Mandibular Reconstruction With Free Fibula Osteocutaneous Graft. J Craniofac Surg (2019) 30(6):e563–6. doi:  10.1097/SCS.0000000000005538   
26. Tang NSJ, Ahmadi I, Ramakrishnan A. Virtual Surgical Planning in Fibula Free Flap Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg (2019) 72(9):1465–77. doi:  10.1016/j.bjps.2019.06.013   
27. Barr ML, Barr ML, Haveles CS, Rezzadeh KS, Nolan IT, Castro R, Lee JC, et al.. Virtual Surgical Planning for Mandibular Reconstruction With the Fibula Free Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Plast Surg (2020) 84(1):117–22. doi:  10.1097/SAP.0000000000002006   
28. Cornelius CP, Smolka W, Giessler GA, Wilde F, Probst FA. Patient-Specific Reconstruction Plates are the Missing Link in Computer-Assisted Mandibular Reconstruction: A Showcase for Technical Description. J Craniomaxillofac Surg (2015) 43(5):624–9. doi:  10.1016/j.jcms.2015.02.016   
29. Wilde F, Cornelius CP, Schramm A. Computer-Assisted Mandibular Reconstruction Using a Patient-Specific Reconstruction Plate Fabricated With Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Techniques. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr (2014) 7(2):158–66. doi:  10.1055/s-0034-1371356   
30. Geusens J, Sun Y, Luebbers HT, Bila M, Darche V, Politis C. Accuracy of Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing-Assisted Mandibular Reconstruction With a Fibula Free Flap. J Craniofac Surg (2019) 30(8):2319–23. doi:  10.1097/SCS.0000000000005704   
31. Kansy K, Mueller AA, Mücke T, Kopp JB, Koersgen F, Wolff KD, et al.. Microsurgical Reconstruction of the Head and Neck–Current Concepts of Maxillofacial Surgery in Europe. J Craniomaxillofac Surg (2014) 42(8):1610–3. doi:  10.1016/j.jcms.2014.04.030   
32. Shroff SS, Nair SC, Shah A, Kumar B. Versatility of Fibula Free Flap in Reconstruction of Facial Defects: A Center Study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg (2017) 16(1):101–7. doi:  10.1007/s12663-016-0930-6   
33. Hölzle F, Kesting MR, Hölzle G, Watola A, Loeffelbein DJ, Ervens J, et al.. Clinical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction After Mandibular Reconstruction With Free Fibula Flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2007) 36(9):802–6. doi:  10.1016/j.ijom.2007.04.013   
34. Colletti G, Autelitano L, Rabbiosi D, Biglioli F, Chiapasco M, Mandala M, et al.. Technical Refinements in Mandibular Reconstruction With Free Fibula Flaps: Outcome-Oriented Retrospective Review of 99 Cases. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital (2014) 34(5):342–8.   
35. Barry CP, MacDhabheid C, Tobin K, Stassen LF, Lennon P, Toner M, et al.. 'Out of House' Virtual Surgical Planning for Mandible Reconstruction After Cancer Resection: Is it Oncologically Safe? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2020). doi:  10.1016/j.ijom.2020.11.008   
36. Knitschke M, Bäcker C, Schmermund D, Böttger S, Streckbein P, Howaldt HP, et al.. Impact of Planning Method (Conventional Versus Virtual) on Time to Therapy Initiation and Resection Margins: A Retrospective Analysis of 104 Immediate Jaw Reconstructions. Cancers (Basel) (2021) 13(12). doi:  10.3390/cancers13123013   
37. Ma C, Wang L, Tian Z, Qin X, Zhu D, Qin J, et al.. Standardize Routine Angiography Assessment of Leg Vasculatures Before Fibular Flap Harvest: Lessons of Congenital and Acquired Vascular Anomalies Undetected by Color Doppler and Physical Examinations. Acta Radiol (2021) p:284185120980001. doi:  10.1177/0284185120980001   
38. Panje W, Cutting C. Trapezius Osteomyocutaneous Island Flap for Reconstruction of the Anterior Floor of the Mouth and the Mandible. Head Neck Surg (1980) 3(1):66–71. doi:  10.1002/hed.2890030112   
39. Sparks DS, Saleh DB, Rozen WM, Hutmacher DW, Schuetz MA, Wagels M. Vascularised Bone Transfer: History, Blood Supply and Contemporary Problems. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg (2017) 70(1):1–11. doi:  10.1016/j.bjps.2016.07.012   
40. Menck J, Sander A. [Periosteal and Endosteal Blood Supply of the Human Fibula and its Clinical Importance]. Acta Anat (Basel) (1992) 145(4):400–5. doi:  10.1159/000147397   
41. Simpson AH. The Blood Supply of the Periosteum. J Anat (1985) 140( Pt 4):697–704.   
42. Rhinelander FW. Tibial Blood Supply in Relation to Fracture Healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1974) 105):34–81. doi:  10.1097/00003086-197411000-00005   
43. Schmidt AB, Giessler GA. The Muscular and the New Osteomuscular Composite Peroneus Brevis Flap: Experiences From 109 Cases. Plast Reconstr Surg (2010) 126(3):924–32. doi:  10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e3b74d   
44. Kofoed H, Sjontoft E, Siemssen SO, Olesen HP. Bone Marrow Circulation After Osteotomy. Blood Flow, Po2, Pco2, and Pressure Studied in Dogs. Acta Orthop Scand (1985) 56(5):400–3. doi:  10.3109/17453678508994357   
45. Kocabiyik N, Yalcin B, Ozan H. Variations of the Nutrient Artery of the Fibula. Clin Anat (2007) 20(4):440–3. doi:  10.1002/ca.20442   
46. Anetai H, Kinose S, Sakamoto R, Onodera R, Kato K, Kawasaki Y, et al.. Anatomic Characterization of the Tibial and Fibular Nutrient Arteries in Humans. Anat Sci Int (2021) 96(3):378–85. doi:  10.1007/s12565-020-00600-9   
47. Zhu YL, Xu YQ, Yang J, Li J, Lan XF. An Anatomic Study of Vascularized Fibular Grafts. Chin J Traumatol (2008) 11(5):279–82. doi:  10.1016/S1008-1275(08)60056-5   
48. Knitschke M, Baumgart AK, Bäcker C, Adelung C, Roller F, Schmermund D, et al.. Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) Before Reconstructive Jaw Surgery Using Fibula Free Flap: Retrospective Analysis of Vascular Architecture. Diagnostics (Basel) (2021) 11(10). doi:  10.3390/diagnostics11101865   
49. Fry AM, Laugharne D, Jones K. Osteotomising the Fibular Free Flap: An Anatomical Perspective. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2016) 54(6):692–3. doi:  10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.11.009   
50. Gilbert A. Vascularised Transfer of the Fibula Shaft. Int J Microsurg (1979) 1:100.
51. Kim D, Orron DE, Skillman JJ. Surgical Significance of Popliteal Arterial Variants. A Unified Angiographic Classification. Ann Surg (1989) 210(6):776–81. doi:  10.1097/00000658-198912000-00014   
52. Knitschke M, Sonnabend S, Bäcker C, Schmermund D, Böttger S, Howaldt HP, et al.. Partial and Total Flap Failure After Fibula Free Flap in Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery: Retrospective Analysis of 180 Flaps Over 19 Years. Cancers (Basel) (2021) 13(4). doi:  10.3390/cancers13040865   
53. Freeman GH, Halton JH. Note on an Exact Treatment of Contingency, Goodness of Fit and Other Problems of Significance. Biometrika (1951) 38(1-2):141–9. doi:  10.1093/biomet/38.1-2.141   
54. Wieker H, Fritz Schomaker MC, Florke C, Karayurek F, Naujokat H, Acil Y, et al.. A Retrospective Analysis of the Surgical Outcomes of Different Free Vascularized Flaps Used for the Reconstruction of the Maxillofacial Region: Hand-Sewn Microvascular Anastomosis vs Anastomotic Coupler Device. J Craniomaxillofac Surg (2021) 49(3):191–5. doi:  10.1016/j.jcms.2020.12.015   
55. Thiem DGE, Frick RW, Goetze E, Gielisch M, Al-Nawas B, Kämmerer PW. Hyperspectral Analysis for Perioperative Perfusion Monitoring-a Clinical Feasibility Study on Free and Pedicled Flaps. Clin Oral Investig (2021) 25(3):933–45. doi:  10.1007/s00784-020-03382-6   
56. Salgado CJ, Moran SL, Mardini S. Flap Monitoring and Patient Management. Plast Reconstr Surg (2009) 124(6 Suppl):e295–302. doi:  10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bcf07b   
57. Ludolph I, Lehnhardt M, Arkudas A, Kneser U, Pierer G, Harder Y, et al.. [Plastic Reconstructive Microsurgery in the Elderly Patient - Consensus Statement of the German Speaking Working Group for Microsurgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir (2018) 50(2):118–25. doi:  10.1055/s-0043-115730   
58. Akashi M, Nomura T, Sakakibara S, Sakakibara A, Hashikawa K. Preoperative MR Angiography for Free Fibula Osteocutaneous Flap Transfer. Microsurgery (2013) 33(6):454–9. doi:  10.1002/micr.22128   
59. Bretzman PA, Manaster BJ, Davis WL, Coleman DA. MR Angiography for Preoperative Evaluation of Vascularized Fibular Grafts. J Vasc Interv Radiol (1994) 5(4):603–10. doi:  10.1016/S1051-0443(94)71561-X   
60. Kelly AM, Cronin P, Hussain HK, Londy FJ, Chepeha DB, Carlos RC. Preoperative MR Angiography in Free Fibula Flap Transfer for Head and Neck Cancer: Clinical Application and Influence on Surgical Decision Making. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2007) 188(1):268–74. doi:  10.2214/AJR.04.1950   
61. Kessler P, Wiltfang J, Schultze-Mosgau S, Lethaus B, Greess H, Neukam FW. The Role of Angiography in the Lower Extremity Using Free Vascularized Fibular Transplants for Mandibular Reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg (2001) 29(6):332–6. doi:  10.1054/jcms.2001.0251   
62. Ling XF, Peng X. What is the Price to Pay for a Free Fibula Flap? A Systematic Review of Donor-Site Morbidity Following Free Fibula Flap Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg (2012) 129(3):657–74. doi:  10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402d9a   
63. Rosson GD, Singh NK. Devascularizing Complications of Free Fibula Harvest: Peronea Arteria Magna. J Reconstr Microsurg (2005) 21(8):533–8. doi:  10.1055/s-2005-922432   
64. Ettinger KS, Alexander AE, Arce K. Computed Tomographic Angiography Perforator Localization for Virtual Surgical Planning of Osteocutaneous Fibular Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2018) 76(10):2220–30. doi:  10.1016/j.joms.2018.04.002   
65. Battaglia S, Maiolo V, Savastio G, Zompatori M, Contedini F, Antoniazzi E, et al.. Osteomyocutaneous Fibular Flap Harvesting: Computer-Assisted Planning of Perforator Vessels Using Computed Tomographic Angiography Scan and Cutting Guide. J Craniomaxillofac Surg (2017) 45(10):1681–6. doi:  10.1016/j.jcms.2017.07.017   
66. Abou-Foul AK, Borumandi F. Anatomical Variants of Lower Limb Vasculature and Implications for Free Fibula Flap: Systematic Review and Critical Analysis. Microsurgery (2016) 36(2):165–72. doi:  10.1002/micr.30016   
67. Alonso-Burgos A, Garcia-Tutor E, Bastarrika G, Cano D, Martinez-Cuesta A, Pina LJ. Preoperative Planning of Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Reconstruction With Multislice-CT Angiography: Imaging Findings and Initial Experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg (2006) 59(6):585–93. doi:  10.1016/j.bjps.2005.12.011   
68. Chiu WK, Lin WC, Chen SY, Tzeng WD, Liu SC, Lee TP, et al.. Computed Tomography Angiography Imaging for the Chimeric Anterolateral Thigh Flap in Reconstruction of Full Thickness Buccal Defect. ANZ J Surg (2011) 81(3):142–7. doi:  10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05483.x   
69. Duymaz A, Karabekmez FE, Vrtiska TJ, Mardini S, Moran SL. Free Tissue Transfer for Lower Extremity Reconstruction: A Study of the Role of Computed Angiography in the Planning of Free Tissue Transfer in the Posttraumatic Setting. Plast Reconstr Surg (2009) 124(2):523–9. doi:  10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181addafa   
70. Gelati C, Lozano Miralles ME, Morselli PG, Fabbri E, Cipriani R. Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Breast Reconstruction With Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing Sizers. Ann Plast Surg (2020) 84(1):24–9. doi:  10.1097/SAP.0000000000002020   
71. Higueras Sune MC, Lopez Ojeda A, Narvaez Garcia JA, De Albert De Las Vigo M, Roca Mas O, Perez Sidelnikova D, et al.. Use of Angioscanning in the Surgical Planning of Perforator Flaps in the Lower Extremities. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg (2011) 64(9):1207–13. doi:  10.1016/j.bjps.2011.03.015   
72. Masia J, Clavero JA, Larranaga JR, Alomar X, Pons G, Serret P. Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography in the Planning of Abdominal Perforator Flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg (2006) 59(6):594–9. doi:  10.1016/j.bjps.2005.10.024   
73. Ngaage LM, Hamed R, Oni G, Di Pace B, Ghorra DT, Koo BBC, et al.. The Role of CT Angiography in Assessing Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Patency in Patients With Pre-Existing Abdominal Scars. J Surg Res (2019) 235:58–65. doi:  10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.059   
74. Prokop M. Multislice CT Angiography. Eur J Radiol (2000) 36(2):86–96. doi:  10.1016/S0720-048X(00)00271-0   
75. Zhang Y, Pan X, Yang H, Yang Y, Huang H, Rui Y. Computed Tomography Angiography for the Chimeric Anterolateral Thigh Flap in the Reconstruction of the Upper Extremity. J Reconstr Microsurg (2017) 33(3):211–7. doi:  10.1055/s-0036-1597587   
76. Piazza C, Grammatica A, Paderno A, Taglietti V, Del Bon F, Marengoni A, et al.. Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction in the Elderly: The University of Brescia Experience. Head Neck (2016) 38 Suppl 1:E1488–92. doi:  10.1002/hed.24264   
77. van Gemert JTM, Abbink JH, van Es RJJ, Rosenberg A, Koole R, Van Cann EM. Early and Late Complications in the Reconstructed Mandible With Free Fibula Flaps. J Surg Oncol (2018) 117(4):773–80. doi:  10.1002/jso.24976   
78. Lodders JN, Schulten EA, de Visscher JG, Forouzanfar T, Karagozoglu KH. Complications and Risk After Mandibular Reconstruction With Fibular Free Flaps in Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Reconstr Microsurg (2016) 32(6):455–63. doi:  10.1055/s-0036-1571794   
79. Abou-Foul AK, Fasanmade A, Prabhu S, Borumandi F. Anatomy of the Vasculature of the Lower Leg and Harvest of a Fibular Flap: A Systematic Review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2017) 55(9):904–10. doi:  10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.08.363   
80. Carroll WR, Esclamado R. Preoperative Vascular Imaging for the Fibular Osteocutaneous Flap. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1996) 122(7):708–12. doi:  10.1001/archotol.1996.01890190006003   
81. Seres L, Csaszar J, Borbely L, Voros E. [Donor Site Digital Subtraction Angiography Before Mandible Reconstruction With Free Fibula Transplantation]. Fogorv Sz (2001) 94(1):15–20.  
82. Yanik B, Bulbul E, Demirpolat G. Variations of the Popliteal Artery Branching With Multidetector CT Angiography. Surg Radiol Anat (2015) 37(3):223–30. doi:  10.1007/s00276-014-1346-y   
83. Futran ND, Stack BC, Jr, Zachariah AP. Ankle-Arm Index as a Screening Examination for Fibula Free Tissue Transfer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (1999) 108(8):777–80. doi:  10.1177/000348949910800811   
84. Astarci P, Siciliano S, Verhelst R, Lacroix V, Noirhomme P, Rubay J, et al.. Intra-Operative Acute Leg Ischaemia After Free Fibula Flap Harvest for Mandible Reconstruction. Acta Chir Belg (2006) 106(4):423–6. doi:  10.1080/00015458.2006.11679921   
85. Young DM, Trabulsy PP, Anthony JP. The Need for Preoperative Leg Angiography in Fibula Free Flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg (1994) 10(5):283–7; discussion 287-9. doi:  10.1055/s-2007-1006596   
86. Oxford L, Ducic Y. Use of Fibula-Free Tissue Transfer With Preoperative 2-Vessel Runoff to the Lower Extremity. Arch Facial Plast Surg (2005) 7(4):261–4; discussion 265. doi:  10.1001/archfaci.7.4.261   
87. Lee MK, Blackwell KE, Kim B, Nabili V. Feasibility of Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction in the Setting of Calcified Arteriosclerosis of the Vascular Pedicle. JAMA Facial Plast Surg (2013) 15(2):135–40. doi:  10.1001/2013.jamafacial.208   
88. Kim RY, Burkes JN, Broker HS, Williams FC. Preoperative Vascular Interventions to Improve Donor Leg Perfusion: A Report of Two Fibula Free Flaps Used in Head and Neck Reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2019) 77(3):658–63. doi:  10.1016/j.joms.2018.10.017   
89. Lorenz RR, Esclamado R. Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Fibular-Free Flap Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects. Head Neck (2001) 23(10):844–50. doi:  10.1002/hed.1123   
90. Bui DT, Cordeiro PG, Hu QY, Disa JJ, Pusic A, Mehrara BJ. Free Flap Reexploration: Indications, Treatment, and Outcomes in 1193 Free Flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg (2007) 119(7):2092–100. doi:  10.1097/01.prs.0000260598.24376.e1   
91. Wood NB, Zhao SZ, Zambanini A, Jackson M, Gedroyc W, Thom SA, et al.. Curvature and Tortuosity of the Superficial Femoral Artery: A Possible Risk Factor for Peripheral Arterial Disease 2006. J Appl Physiol (1985) (2006) 101(5):1412–8. doi:  10.1152/japplphysiol.00051.2006   
92. Jones NF, Monstrey S, Gambier BA. Reliability of the Fibular Osteocutaneous Flap for Mandibular Reconstruction: Anatomical and Surgical Confirmation. Plast Reconstr Surg (1996) 97(4):707–16; discussion 717-8. doi:  10.1097/00006534-199604000-00003   
93. Bähr W. Blood Supply of Small Fibula Segments: An Experimental Study on Human Cadavers. J Craniomaxillofac Surg (1998) 26(3):148–52. doi:  10.1016/S1010-5182(98)80004-8   
94. Fichter AM, Ritschl LM, Georg R, Kolk A, Kesting MR, Wolff KD, et al.. Effect of Segment Length and Number of Osteotomy Sites on Cancellous Bone Perfusion in Free Fibula Flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg (2018).  
95. Chang EI, Chu CK, Chang EI. Advancements in Imaging Technology for Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer. J Surg Oncol (2018) 118(5):729–35. doi:  10.1002/jso.25194   
96. Momoh AO, Yu P, Skoracki RJ, Liu S, Feng L, Hanasono MM. A Prospective Cohort Study of Fibula Free Flap Donor-Site Morbidity in 157 Consecutive Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg (2011) 128(3):714–20. doi:  10.1097/PRS.0b013e318221dc2a   
97. Shindo M, Fong BP, Funk GF, Karnell LH. The Fibula Osteocutaneous Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Critical Evaluation of Donor Site Morbidity. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2000) 126(12):1467–72. doi:  10.1001/archotol.126.12.1467   
98. Fang H, Liu F, Sun C, Pang P. Impact of Wound Closure on Fibular Donor-Site Morbidity: A Meta-Analysis. BMC Surg (2019) 19(1):81. doi:  10.1186/s12893-019-0545-1   
99. Fry AM, Patterson A, Orr RL, Colver GB. Open Wound Healing of the Osseocutaneous Fibula Flap Donor Site. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2014) 52(9):861–3. doi:  10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.05.003   
100. Bach CA, Guillere L, Yildiz S, Wagner I, Darmon S, Chabolle F. Comparison of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Conventional Dressing Methods for Fibula Free Flap Donor Site Management in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. Head Neck (2016) 38(5):696–9. doi:  10.1002/hed.23952   
101. Yu P, Youssef A. Efficacy of the Handheld Doppler in Preoperative Identification of the Cutaneous Perforators in the Anterolateral Thigh Flap. Plast Reconstr Surg (2006) 118(4):928–33. doi:  10.1097/01.prs.0000232216.34854.63   
102. Islam S, Ansari U, Walton GM. Role of Real-Time Colour-Flow Doppler in Perforator Free Flap Head and Neck Reconstruction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2021) 59(1):111–3. doi:  10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.008   
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

丁香叶与你快乐分享

微信公众号

管理员微信

服务时间:8:30-21:30

站长微信/QQ

← 微信/微信群

← QQ

Copyright © 2013-2024 丁香叶 Powered by dxye.com  手机版 
快速回复 返回列表 返回顶部